And Your Next Two AVENGERS Are…

Long rumored but now seemingly confirmed by Joss Whedon to IGN, joining the team (or at least in the film to some capacity) will be Wanda and Pietro Maximoff, better known as The Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver. He’s basically The Flash if he was a Eurotrashy douchebag, she can manipulate probability – i.e. she can make pretty-much anything happen through “magic” handwaved with psuedo-science. They’re fraternal twins, originally villains who reformed and joined The Avengers alongside fellow ex-baddie Hawkeye during the team’s first major overhaul (everyone quit but Captain America, leaving him to train a new team of ex-villains.)

And now things get interesting…
Here’s why this is kind of a big deal: Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch, in the comcis, are Mutants. Supposedly, “all” of Marvel’s Mutants are owned as part of the “X-Men Family” by Fox; so they can’t show up in any non-Fox Marvel films. Normally, that shouldn’t be a problem: “Mutant” in the Marvel Universe essentially means anyone who is a human born with an extra-human sense or ability, so it would not be tremendously difficult to augment them into some other variation on “born like this” (or just give them new origins) for “Avengers 2.”

But these aren’t just any two Mutants: Despite being overall more-associated with the Avengers franchise (which is why they can be in this at all, Mutant or not) Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch started out as members of The Brotherhood of Evil Mutants… and they’re Magneto’s children.

Now, sure – that can be written out just as easily as having them be capital-M Mutants, but it also negates most of what would make them novel as members of an ostensible good-guy team. And they’re not exactly popular or novel enough for me to imagine Marvel insisting on their presence – nobody really cares about Quicksilver and there are many more-popular Marvel heroines than Scarlet Witch – so Joss Whedon or someone else on the creative side wanted them specifically for this. That’s interesting.
Here’s the thing: Fox would probably do anything (short of relinquishing the X-rights themselves) to have “their” X-Men franchise be “officially” connected to “Avengers,” even tangentially. Suddenly, any random Mutant movie they crap out becomes much close to must-see because “hey, we might need to have seen this for the next ‘Avengers’ movie!” So the question isn’t whether or not Fox would “go for” some kind of shared-custody of the Mutant characters (they probably would,) nor if Fox and Disney/Marvel have already talked about this (you’d best believe they have – everyone who owns a Marvel franchise has been talking about how to get in on the action, FX scheduling is supposedly the only reason you didn’t see “Amazing Spider-Man’s” OsCorp building in “Avengers.”) The only question is whether Marvel is willing to “work something out” or would rather hold back until Fox has a bad year and needs to sell the X-characters back altogether.
I have a suspicion that there’s another shoe or three yet to drop on this, especially since there’s a LONG time between now and “Avengers 2.” But for now, Fox has two “X-Men” movies set for this year alone, and if they’re both hits that gives them a slightly stronger bargaining position assuming any bargaining is actively going on (I suspect there is, but you never know.)

Final(?) "PACIFIC RIM" Trailer Hits

I really, really hope that this marks the start of a much bigger push for this movie. Fairly or not, I feel like so much is riding on “Pacific Rim.” An original (read: not a sequel, remake, reboot, adaptation, etc) big-budget genre movie? Guillermo Del Toro finally on the cusp of the blockbuster clout he should’ve had a decade ago? Giant monsters and robots up onscreen with no “apology” for their own existence or attempt to make them palatable to audiences that might turn their noses up otherwise?

If something like this doesn’t “succeed,” it validates all the worst chickenshit instincts of the current studio-system. “Joe Popcorn” (or whatever the current euphemism is) probably doesn’t deserve this movie… but I hope “he” shows up anyway. There’s more riding on this than just this.


Fox’s "SLEEPY HOLLOW" TV series. Holy. Cow.

I’m an on-record eye-roller when it comes to the Orci/Kurtzman team, not because they so often make bad movies and TV shows but because the bad stuff they make is often so close to being awesome. So much of their output plays like a “sanitized” version of someone else’s batshit-nuts brilliant idea; and as I continue to say: A crazy, unwieldy, unworkably ridiculous idea unleashed full-force – even and often especially if the result is spectacularly embarassing – is preferable to competently-executed mediocrity: Please me, horrify me, just don’t BORE me.

With that in mind, the trailer for O/K’s latest TV effort for Fox, “Sleepy Hollow;” in which Icabod Crane and the Headless Horseman are ressurrected in present-day New England to continue their battle anew. With Dan Brown-style historical conspiracy theories. And machine guns. And it looks AWESOMEly terrible.
Looks like these guys are finally heeding the sage advice of every assistant director on every porno ever: If you’re gonna suck, at least suck well:


Sooooo many things I love about this – mostly ironically (because really, this looks soooo fucking stupid) but some genuinely:
Icabod Crane is now some kind of super-agent contracted by George Washington to kill the Hessian brute who becomes the Headless Horseman. LOVE IT… because it’s so point-missingly dumb, like something out of an old “Spawn” comic.
“He described the man I saw in PERFECT DETAIL!” In that she saw a man without a head on a horse, and Crane apparently used the standard two-word description for that.
Orlando Jones is in it. Orlando Jones rules.
So is John Cho!
The decade-old “too many Starbucks” joke getting dragged out, again. Um… LA writers? Do your research. If they’re in New England, 2/3rds of those are Dunkin Donuts.
Jones calling Icabod “Captain America.”
“Turn around and put your hands on your… OH GOD!!!”

Treasure maps? Ancient good vs. evil Witch War conspiracy? “The secret is in Washington’s Bible?” So dumb. So beautiful.
Icabod’s mission: Thwart armageddon – apparently The Headless Horseman is also one of the Four Horseman of The Apocalypse. Because… that’s two supernatural things that everyone knows has the word “Horseman” in them. That’s the sort of thing you’d put into a parody of bad Alan Moore-wannabe literary-mashup stuff, and here it is as the hook of a real TV show. Perfection.
The Headless Horseman, wearing an ammo-belt over his Hessian war coat, firing a submachine gun at cops gangsta-style.
Icabod assumes his black female cop partner is a freed slave.
“HEADS! WILL! ROLL!” Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. I would love this if it were just a “Funny Or Die” parody of someone’s insane pitch for a “Once Upon A Time” bandwagon-jumper, but I think I’ll love it even more as a somehow-meant-to-be-taken-seriously actual show. Bring it on.

Close The Blast Doors

There’s been fan-scripts and fans-becoming-writers, but this might be the first time in history that a TV series has opted to create a spin-off series and a theatrical movie… effectively based on it’s own fan-art.

“Equestria Girls” is a spin-off movie (and apparently also a series pilot) from the rebooted surprise crossover-hit “My Little Pony” cartoon; built on the conceit of the main character dimension-jumping into the human world; where she and the other recurring characters appear as human versions of themselves. If we’re going to start building movies around Deviant Art trends, I’ll just assume that some other franchise will take “____ If They Were Mega Man Sprites” and “_____ But Everyone Is A Dog.”
Not really my thing either way, but I’m familiar enough with both the harmless and decidedly-less-pleasant fringes of “Brony” culture to comfortably predict that this will probably do surprising boxoffice… and that if any of the main character winds up with a boyfriend he’s going to be the most frighteningly-hated cartoon love-interest since that guy from the later seasons of “Daria” in certain unfortunate circles of the web.


http://graphics8.nytimes.com/bcvideo/1.0/iframe/embed.html?videoId=100000002220706&playerType=embed

Full "Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D." Teaser

And now, here it is: The first teaser for “Agents of S.H.I.E.LD.,” which effectively frames the show as “‘The X-Files’ But More Funny And With Those Guys From ‘The Avengers.'” The mysterious-man sequence is now unblurred, and we can now clearly see that the unnamed superhuman in question is indeed a black man wearing a hoodie. I still say it’s probably Luke Cage.

Gotta chuckle at how they manage to work in ultra-short “cameos” for The Avengers without having to show (and thus pay) the actors associated with them – Thor’s hammer, Cap’s shield, Iron Man flying, Banner in Hulk-form, etc.

I’m excited about this. There’s a lot of fun stuff to mess around with in the Marvel universe that may not need or warrant a full movie or full act in a movie – you could probably get a solid syndication-worthy run of shows JUST out of having them chase B and C-list supervillains around every week.

Screencaps: Who Is This Hero(?) In The "Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D." Teaser?

A moment ago I posted the “Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.” pre-tease, which opens with a motion-blurred action shot of an unidentified person(?) rescuing a woman from a burning building by jumping out the window and landing safely with enough force to crater the pavement on impact.

Below the jump, some screencaps of the very brief action-shot for a clearer look and possible guesses as to who this might be:

1. Basic window-jump shot, nothing too unusual looking under the circumstances.

2. Little more clear, can see “jumper” separate from “cargo.” Tan/gold color blur at play. Iron Man cameo, maybe?

3. Much more defined now. “Cargo” is wearing gray suit and skirt, jumper has gold/tan pants or leggings. Arm of jumper, visibly distinct from white legs (stockings?) of cargo suggest either dark skin-tone or clothing.

4. There’s a motion-blur effect on the footage, so this is about as clear as it’s going to get: Unidentified red-haired woman in a gray suit being carried by a larger person (likely but not definitely male) wearing what appear to be tan or mustard-colored pants – could be bellbottoms, but probably the wind.

5. Whoever the rescuer is, he’s strong/heavy enough to both land safely and do major damage to solid concrete when he lands. Still motion-blurred, but this last one looks about as good as it’s going to get for now.

While allowing that the aforementioned motion blur could be further obscuring things, what this looks like is an unknown woman being rescued by a larger and unusually-powerful unknown man of apparently darker complexion. Is this The Hulk? I don’t think so – he’s not quite “Hulk Big” and I don’t think the current Movieverse Hulk runs on the Silver Age comics mechanics of Hulk changing size depending on his mood like the Ang Lee Hulk did. Also, this guy appears to be wearing shoes, and his hair is either blown-upwards or styled in a manner that doesn’t scream “Hulk” to me. My (and I’m betting a lot of other people’s) best guess? Assuming for a moment that this is a Marvel character and not someone made up for the series, this could be our first glimpse of a live-action Luke Cage. 

A mainstay of Marvel’s aggressive (if occasionally awkward) diversity push in the 70s, Cage was a wrongfully-imprisoned black youth who was subjected to experiments in prison (yet another half-formed attempt to recreate the Super Soldier Serum that created Captain America) that wound up making him super-strong and virtually indestructible. You’d think they’d test something designed to that on anyone other than convicts, but there you go. He was mainly popular in the 70s before getting sidelined for a good long while, only to be brought back to the forefront in “Alias” and soon promoted by positive fan response to being a major fixture of the post-Mansion Avengers lineups.

If this is him, it makes a lot of sense: Cage is a street-level guy, doesn’t go in for elaborate costumes or gear and his abilities are fairly simple to visualize. He also has (or had) a fun, story-ready gimmick: Cage was New York’s resident “Hero For Hire” – instead of going out looking for wrongs to right, he let clients come to him and procure his day-saving services. He’d been previously set to be a recurring character in the “Alias: Jessica Jones” TV series, which never went to air and may or may not have had some of it’s assets folded into this project.

Secondary possibility: That the rescuer looks to be of notably darker complexion than the woman could be an illusion of the blur/shooting, in which case that could be anybody. There’ve been various “official” explanations, for example, as to how Coulson is back; but a popular fan theory going all the way back to “Avengers” has been that the original Coulson is indeed dead and this one is an LMD (“Life Model Decoy,” aka “a robot”) that will wind up being coverted into The Vision for a future “Avengers” sequel. Some additional tangential “evidence” to that end: Of all the onscreen superheroes, Coulson is most closely associated with Captain America; whose movie featured a hard-to-miss cameo by a certain artificial-man who, in the comics, was used to build Vision’s body. It doesn’t look like a suped-up Robo-Coulson is making the save here, but it’s a possibility sure.