Thought For The Day

The problem with discussing issues of “gender politics” online is that the conversation will inevitably be dominated by an ever-expanding subgroup of men who are just lazy enough to decide that they’d rather give up on the prospect of ever having sex altogether rather than undertake whatever steps of self-improvement or even self-awareness might be necessary to correct that condition… yet somehow just motivated enough to project their bitterness and hatred away from themselves (or genetics, or God, or whatever) and instead onto women – to such an obsessive degree that they’ll construct paranoid delusions of a female conspiracy* of “oppression.”

*My sincere apologies to anyone who clicks that link and has to listen to this guy…

Christopher Nolan Will NOT Produce "Justice League"

Here’s the thing about the on-again/off-again rumors of Christopher Nolan producing the “Justice League” movie Warner Bros. wants to make if “Man of Steel” is a hit: Warner Bros. wants him to. Warner Bros. will ALWAYS want him to – if you were them, wouldn’t you want to be able to stick “From The Producer of  ‘The Dark Knight'” on as many movies as possible? The question has never been “Does WB want Nolan for this?” but rather “Does Nolan want even more clout badly enough to keep spending time on a project/genre he expressly has no interest in if not outright contempt for?”

According to Entertainment Weekly, the answer now seems to be “no.” Nolan already has a big scifi blockbuster called “Interstellar” in production, and WB head Jeff Robinov now tells the inexplicably still-viable movie magazine that not Nolan is not involved with “League” while officially confirming that “Man of Steel” will establish a universe where all manner of other DC characters can exist and may or may not be eluded to in the film itself. He also seems to confirm (lets all keep in mind that all of this contradicts the earliest reports that “Man of Steel” itself was to be a stand-alone film) that the Dark Knight Trilogy will not be part of this new continuity.
Okay. I like the sound of ALL of that. Lets see how this works out…

Help Me Out Here

Bank of America has a new commercial airing in which a woman uses a smartphone while sitting in a movie theater (during the show.) In the context of the ad she, the phone, and Bank of America are the heroes – isn’t  she AWESOME for being able to take care of her mobile-banking during the movie?

This makes me angrier than a commercial has made me in awhile, to the degree that I can’t even believe I saw it – especially since BOfA doesn’t seem to have it posted anywhere. Judging by Twitter, I’m not the only one who saw this on a commercial break during tonight’s Daily Show, but I can’t find a copy on the web to properly rage at: Internet? I need your help: Somebody find a link to this commercial online (no, it is NOT the thing called “BOfA Movie Theater” from 2000) and post it to the comments here. Thank you.

Hate The Player

So! A day ago, everyone got up in arms about Apple knocking Saga #12 off it’s App Store because of a postage-stamp sized gay sex scene. Now, it turns out it wasn’t missing from the App Store by Apple specific order but was rather withheld by Comixology themselves for fear of getting slapped around by Apple’s silly, arbitrary, draconian censorship policies. So, basically, The Internet got all torches-and-pitchforks furious at Apple for something they were only indirectly responsible for; and now The Internet is supposed to learn a valuable lesson about jumping to conclusions or something and feel very, very bad about it’s behavior.

Well, I don’t feel bad. At all. In fact, I think that the reflexive rush to bring the hammer down on Apple is an incredibly positive development.

Here’s the thing: While this time it turned out to be a false alarm; I’m encouraged by the idea that The Internet was ready to pillory Apple at the drop of a hat. Even when they turn out to be not the “villain” in this or that instance, inherent mistrust is always the proper place to start from when dealing with corporations. Not because they’re “evil,” or because of “capitalism,” or because they’re run by Freemason Reptoids, but because that’s the proper way to approach an entity that exists to exploit you – yes, even when said exploitation is benign or enjoyable to you.

The history of Apple as a modern corporate entity is a history of a company rebranding itself, largely through the efforts of a charismatic leader-figure, as not just a “cool” and “chic” company but a “good” one. Buying – and remaining loyal to the buying of – Apple-brand products (which Apple encouraged through unprecedented focus on proprietary device-linkage) became, perversely, a way of voluntarily branding yourself: “I’m Team Good-Guy Tech!” This was, of course, back when the cultural dynamic in tech was Jobs the Cool Visionary vs. Gates the Creepy Nerd With Too Much Money (what’s he spending it on – pocket protectors LOLOLOLOLOL!) rather than Jobs the Socially-Cold Control Freak vs. Gates the Guy Spending Billions Fighting AIDS and World Poverty.

So yeah, while it’s unfortunate that incorrect information got mass-reported as news, I find it gratifying as hell to see some real confirmation that Apple’s “sainthood” seems to have passed on with Steve Jobs (and, just to be clear, I’ve got no “personal” beef with the late Mr. Jobs and own many Apple products.) Assuming that Apple was in the wrong here may have been an incorrect assumption (though lets be perfectly clear here: The reason the book wasn’t there is still largely owed to Apple’s control-freak content policies) but it was a very correct instinct. Apple is a very large, very powerful corporation that has pulled some really, seriously shady shit over the years – including shady shit involving how they manage (read: control and restrict) content producers through the omnipresence of their digital-retail outlets. That you believed Apple had done something that sounded like something Apple would do reflects much worse on Apple than it does on you.

This is, overall, healthy behavior. There’s nothing wrong with prefering one product over another, or having a preferred manufacturer, or liking one company’s policies more than another, or any of that. But “loyalty” and “trust” are things you should give to people; and in case you slept through the most recent election it’s been rather definitively established that corporations are NOT people, my friends. Paradoxically, when you “trust” a corporation, all you’re doing is giving them leeway to make themselves less worthy of that trust.

Love the things you love, absolutely. “Love” Apple, if you want. But you should always be keeping one critical, mistrustful eye on corporations – especially the “good” ones. Because Apple doesn’t love you back. Neither does Valve. Neither does Nintendo. Neither does Marvel. Neither do any of the “good” companies the tech world likes to canonize with one hand while absurdly declaring EA (bastards, to be sure, but far less “evil” than Monsanto, the Koch Bros, etc) “World’s Worst Company.”

This is, overall, a good development.

Yes, I Saw The Chris Roberts Video

Oh hey, look! Chris Roberts – onetime famous PC game designer turned moderately-successful movie producer turned space sim kickstarter-helmer – used a bit of THIS infamous Big Picture episode as part of a SXSW panel about the non-death of PC gaming (which feels a lot more like a very lengthy live-performance advertisement for his kickstarted space sim “Star Citizen,” but whatever; business is business)! Nifty!

I mean, yeah, it’s totally out of context and kinda makes it seem like I’m saying something completely opposite what I ultimately was in that episode, and it would’ve been nice to see some attribution since, y’know, I’m also in business here… BUT! exposure is exposure, and fun to see all the same even though – yes – I understand that he likely intends it’s presence to be representative of all the ::ironic quotes:: “EXPERTS!!!” he intends to show who’s the boss. Them’s the breaks.

And now, for context, the original episode in-full:

Blomkamp’s "Elysium" Is Class-Warfare… With Mecha-Suits

Hooooooly shit.

First trailer for Neil “I Almost Wasted All This Talent On The ‘Halo’ Movie” Blomkamp’s follow-up to the magnificient “District 9” has hit, and it kicks ass. It’s another socially-conscious scifi actioner, this time casting Matt Damon as the point-man (leader?) of a team from poverty-ravaged 2159 Earth who use strength-augmenting mechanical exo-skeletons to launch an incursion against the titular Elysium, an orbiting space-station where humanity’s wealthy elite have walled themselves off from the rest of us (and, from the look of things, have no shortage of robot soldiers working to keep said rest of us out.)

Yeah, this looks good…


Margaret Thatcher is Dead

Headline sort of sums it up: Former British PM Margaret Thatcher, ill for some time now, died today of an apparent stroke. She was most-recently the subject of the Meryl Streep Oscar-Aquisition Device “The Iron Lady,” my review of which appeared here and I’ll repost below the jump to mark the occasion.

As a student of history, I have my own general outlook on Thatcher’s legacy… but frankly the opinions that count for much more at the moment are those of the folks in the UK who lived either during her tenure or lived through the after-effects thereof. The moment belongs to them, and UK folks among my readership (or, y’know, anyone else really) are invited to weigh in in the comments – given the way most of my British/UK aquaintances tended to speak of her for the most part, I imagine the discussion will be spirited to say the least:

"Carrie" Re-Make Full Trailer

The buzz on the “Carrie” remake was that it’s not very good, which may or may not be responsible for it getting bounced to mid-Fall; but you can’t always trust those sorts of things. Anyway, now it’s got a full trailer which aims to help get everybody who never saw the original classic get on the same page with those who did by giving away the entire story in two minutes…


http://movies.yahoo.com/video/carrie-trailer-2-231012436.html?format=embed&player_autoplay=false

Well… it’s “Carrie” alright. Obviously can’t hope to touch the original DePalma film, one of the all-time great horror flicks, but it’ll be interesting to see the story (summary: abused/bullied teen has telekinesis, everybody pays) played out with characters who look more convincingly like high-schoolers.

Re-staging the car-flip as a slo-mo/bullet-time CGI gag is depressingly innevitable, though it should be fun to see whether they go even further on Carrie’s mother’s Christian zealotry (an edgy move for the late-70s) or dial it back for fear of pissing off Flyover audiences; and I wonder if there’ll be pressure to tone down the ambiguity of the original finale (yeah, it’s supposed to ALSO be Carrie flipping to the Dark Side… but most of her class more-or-less had it coming by that point) now that “misunderstood kid on a rampage” is more of a ‘thing’ in the popular-consciousness…